Penn Evidence-Based Literature Review (PEBLR)

Summarized highlights from contemporary literature in surgical and allied disciplines for general surgery residents.

Cardiac Surgery

Failure to rescue: obesity increases the risk of mortality following early graft failure in heart transplantation in UNOS database patients
Herbst DA, Iyengar A, Weingarten N, Helmers MR, Kim ST, Atluri P.  CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2022
Contributor: J. Nate Diehl, summarizing an article written by D. Alan Herbst

Brief Synopsis

This is a retrospective case-control study that utilized the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to assess recipient characteristics that affect 90-day mortality following early graft failure (EGF) after cardiac transplantation. The authors found that BMI > 30 was significantly associated with a higher mortality rate after EGF following cardiac transplantation.

Summary: Heart failure affects 64.3 million patients worldwide, and orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) remains the definitive treatment. Primary graft dysfunction remains a rare but serious outcome and is defined as single or biventricular failure without a secondary cause in the immediate postoperative period. The surrogate variable ‘early graft failure’ (EGF) was used in this study due to limitations of data reporting in the UNOS dataset. Between 2000 and 2019, 63,046 adults received an OHT, and 302 patients experienced EGF on postoperative day one. Overall, 90-day mortality was a dismal 82% among all patients with EGF, and only 7/302 (2.9%) survived without re-transplantation.

The authors compared recipient factors between deceased patients and patients who survived following EGF. Deceased patients had a significantly higher BMI (28 vs. 26) and BMI > 30 was a risk factor for mortality (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.41-7.82) after donor-adjusted multivariable analysis. While prior studies have evaluated the influence of donor characteristics on EGF and recipient survival, this is the first analysis of a large national transplant database to determine recipient characteristics that predict mortality after EGF.

Society guidelines frequently re-evaluate donor and recipient characteristics that influence graft and recipient survival. The 2016 International Society for Heart & Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus recommended against transplanting patients with BMI > 35. The findings in the present study further demonstrate the need to be prepared for re-transplant or aggressive rescue in obese patients who experience EGF after OHT.

This study also briefly touches on bariatric surgery prior to OHT as an effective method to lower a patient’s BMI to become a candidate for OHT. More work is needed to understand whether GLP agonists will play a significant and safe role in pre-operative weight loss for individuals with BMI > 35 in need of orthotopic heart transplantation. Limitations of this study include lack of granularity in the UNOS database (requiring the use of a surrogate outcome) as well as missing data that may affect mortality in OHT recipients, such as donor-recipient size mismatch or pulmonary resistance.

Bottom Line: Development of early graft failure after cardiac transplantation is associated with a high 90-day mortality (82%). Among patients who develop EGF, recipient BMI > 30 is significantly associated with 90-day mortality (OR 3.32). Careful donor selection is warranted in obese recipients to maximize the likelihood of survival.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Reporting of Discrimination by Health Care Consumers Through Online Customer Reviews
Tong JKC, Akpek E, Naik A, et al. JAMA Network Open. 2022
Contributor: Kathleen Davin, summarizing an article written by Jason Tong

Brief Synopsis

This qualitative study uses public consumer reviews of healthcare systems and hospitals as a tool to examine experiences of discrimination in healthcare. Through qualitative content analysis, the authors identified six discrete patterns of discrimination in healthcare settings not consistently captured by hospital quality metrics and propose these as targets for future interventions.

Summary: In this qualitative study, the authors randomly sampled 100 acute care hospitals with at least 10 reviews on Yelp (n=7885), with selected hospital reviews posted from January 2011 to December 2020. Using the validated Everyday Discrimination Scale, they developed a list of keywords to identify reviews possibly associated with discrimination and employed a modified grounded theory framework and content analysis to generate a codebook describing six recurring patterns of discrimination experienced by healthcare consumers based on the Everyday Discrimination Scale and a test set of Yelp reviews not included in further analysis.

From these 100 randomly selected hospitals, the authors initially collected 10,535 reviews of hospitals from Yelp. Keyword filtering narrowed the pool to 2,986 reviews potentially associated with discrimination, and 182 of these were found to describe discrimination based on manual review and assessment of actor, setting, and directionality. Of these 182 reviews signaling discrimination, 72 (39.6%) cited individuals, both clinical and nonclinical, 53 (29.1%) described institutional racism, 89 (48.9%) described acts occurring in clinical spaces, 25 (13.7%) described acts occurring in nonclinical spaces, and 66 (36.3%) described discrimination directed towards healthcare providers by consumers.

Using their established codebook, the authors described six recurrent manifestations of discrimination present in these reviews, including acts of commission (purposeful acts of harassment), acts of omission (care or resources delayed or neglected), disrespectful or unprofessional behavior, dehumanizing, stereotyping, and intimidation. Each of these themes has previously and independently been described as contributors to medical errors, and the authors posit that these manifestations of discrimination could result in individual harm and contribute to inequity, thus serving as targets for future intervention by approaching discrimination as a harm amenable to quality improvement efforts.

There are several limitations to this study. Of the large total number of reviews, only a small percentage specifically mentioned discrimination, and it is unclear based on the authors’ keyword filtering which excluded reviews would have been relevant. Additionally, Yelp reviews are a highly subjective, anonymous measure and the inability to discuss reviews with authors leaves out important context surrounding described events and individuals that would better elucidate correlation with objective inequities in care. The inability to assess the demographics of the authors of the Yelp reviews and the potential for unsubstantiated claims of discrimination in these reviews, and the inherent bias in review platforms like Yelp (more bias towards extremely positive or negative reviews) also introduces confounding and bias.

Bottom Line: By analyzing consumer reviews of acute care hospitals, the authors identified six recurrent themes present in experiences of discrimination in healthcare, in both clinical and nonclinical settings, and propose using these manifestations as targets of established patient safety and quality improvement interventions.

Surgical Oncology

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Alters Intratumoral CD8+ T-cell Subtype Composition and Activity
Tieniber AD, Hanna AN, Medina BD, et al. Cancer Immunology Research. 2022
Contributor: Michael Clark, summarizing an article written by Andrew Tieniber

Brief Synopsis

This study investigates the impact of imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), on CD8+ T cells in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The authors found that imatinib reduced effector CD8+ T cells and increased naive CD8+ T cells, limiting the antitumor response. Adding an IL15 superagonist (IL15SA) to imatinib restored effector T-cell function and improved tumor destruction. The combination of IL15SA and immune-checkpoint blockades (ICB) with imatinib was most effective in killing tumors.

Summary:
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common human sarcomas, primarily caused by mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes. Imatinib has significantly improved the survival of patients with advanced GIST but is rarely curative due to secondary mutations. Despite the robust immune infiltrate, combining imatinib with ICB has shown limited efficacy in advanced GIST. Therefore, the goal of this study was to identify the limitations imposed by imatinib on the antitumor immune response by analyzing CD8+ T-cell subsets in a genetically engineered mouse model of GIST.

First, to characterize the baseline phenotype of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cell, bulk RNA-sequencing of CD8+ T-cells from tumors, lymph nodes, and spleens in Kit mutant mice was utilized, which showed higher inflammatory markers in tumor-infiltrating cells compared to more naive T-cells in lymph nodes and spleens. Flow cytometry confirmed these findings, showing a predominance of effector memory subtypes in tumors.

Second, to determine the effects of imatinib therapy on tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cells, repeat bulk RNA-seq on CD8+ T-cells from imatinib-treated and untreated Kit mutant mice was used, which revealed increased naive-type transcripts in tumor-infiltrating cells of treated mice, not seen in lymph nodes or spleens. Single-cell RNA-seq and flow cytometry showed this shift became more pronounced with prolonged treatment.

Third, to elucidate the mechanisms driving the shift from effector memory-type to naïve-type phenotypes in the setting of imatinib therapy, the authors performed several hypothesis-driven experiments which demonstrated that changes in tumoral chemokine production, impaired PI3K signaling, and decreased clonal expansion may all be implicated in the phenotypic shift following imatinib therapy. This suggests alterations in recruitment, antigen presentation, and/or co-stimulation mechanisms may be at play.

Fourth, to assess presence of phenotypic shifts in human GISTs, flow cytometry on human GIST specimens from patients treated with imatinib was performed, which showed a decrease in effector memory-type and increase in naive-type CD8+ T-cells in imatinib-sensitive tumors, consistent with the murine model.

Fifth, to investigate strategies that may improve antitumoral CD8+ T-cell response, several KitV558/+ mice were treated with imatinib, an IL15 super-agonist (IL15SA), or imatinib plus an IL15SA for one week. IL15 stimulation, combined with imatinib, showed a synergistic effect, reducing tumor weight by 30%. Additional experiments indicated improved PI3K pathway activity and a greater presence of effector memory-type CD8+ T-cells with triple therapy (imatinib, IL15 super-agonist, and anti-PD-1).

As this study demonstrates the complex interplay of immune cells, it also shows that pinpointing specific therapeutic targets is challenging. Additionally, the human GIST samples showed variability in immune cell populations and responses to imatinib, which may affect the reproducibility and applicability of findings across different patient populations. While the combination of TKIs and immunotherapies shows promise, further research is needed to determine the optimal therapeutic timing and sequencing.

Bottom Line: Imatinib therapy alters intra-tumoral CD8+ T-cell phenotype composition and antitumor activity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Combining T-cell agonistic therapy with imatinib improves CD8+ T-cell antitumor function. These results provide a rationale for including T-cell agonistic therapies in the treatment of GIST with TKI.

Share This Page: