Synopsis: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy is currently the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), in which patients receive all therapy before surgery, has emerged as a potential therapeutic alternative for these patients. TNT has numerous hypothesized benefits over the traditional treatment paradigm, including the potential for earlier administration of effective systemic therapy, downstaging before surgery to increase the rates of margin-negative and sphincter-sparing resections, and increasing the rates of complete pathologic response (pCR) upon resection, which is associated with lower rates of locoregional relapse and improved survival outcomes. Both standard and TNT protocols for LARC routinely use 5-fluorouracil and platinum based chemotherapeutic agents. However, thus far, studies have not been able to demonstrate superior disease-free or overall survival rates for LARC with TNT. In this context, there is growing interest in incorporating novel targeted molecular and immune checkpoint blockade agents into TNT treatment protocols. The discovery of programmed death-ligand 1 expression on colorectal tumor cells following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has led some to consider whether the addition of anti-programmed death 1 therapies, such as pembrolizumab, may further improve the efficacy of TNT.
In this paper, Rahma et al. evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab therapy concomitant with traditional TNT. The authors performed a phase 2 randomized clinical trial using an intent-to-treat analysis comparing neoadjuvant rectal scores (NAR), pCR rates, and R0 and sphincter-sparing surgery rates between patients who received traditional TNT alone versus those who received traditional TNT plus pembrolizumab. The primary outcome, the NAR score, incorporates a number of post-neoadjuvant therapy pathologic metrics to evaluate rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment, and has been shown to correlate better with disease-free and overall survival than pCR alone. Lower NAR scores indicate a stronger response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Patients in the control arm (CA) received induction FOLFOX, followed by chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU and 4500 cGY of radiation plus a 540-cGY boost, followed by surgical resection. Patients in the pembrolizumab arm (PA) received the same treatment as the CA arm, with the addition of up to 200mg of pembrolizumab during the chemoradiotherapy phase of treatment. A total of 95 and 90 patients were randomized to the CA and PA arms, respectively. Eighty-one of the 90 patients in the PA arm were able to start radiotherapy and thus be eligible to receive pembrolizumab, although only 37 (45.7%) of these patients completed the full 6 dose regimen. Ultimately, 137 patients (68 in the CA and 69 in the PA) completed TNT and underwent surgical resection with the required pathologic data to compute NAR scores. The mean NAR scores for PA (11.55, standard deviation 12.43) and CA (14.08, standard deviation 13.82) did not significantly differ (p=0.26). The two groups did not significantly differ in their rates of pCR either: 31.9% in the PA versus 29.4% in the CA, p=0.75. The rate of sphincter-sparing surgical resections was lower for PA compared to CA, though the difference was not statistically significant (59.4% vs. 71.0%, p=0.15). Finally, the rates of R0 resections were similar between the two groups (94.0% PA vs. 89.4% CA, p=0.36). Thirty-five patients (43.2%) in the PA developed immune-related adverse events, although only 3 (3.7%) developed grade 3 events, and no grade 4 or 5 events occurred.
Overall, this trial demonstrated that concomitant administration of pembrolizumab with traditional TNT was both safe (acceptable rates of immune-related adverse events) and feasible (equivalent proportions of patients within the PA and CA groups made it to surgery), but not efficacious in improving NAR scores. Further studies are needed to determine the ultimate role of novel immune checkpoint blockade or targeted molecular agents to current treatment regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer.